SPEAKING OUT:
MORE THOUGHTS ABOUT CROW'S NEST
(back to "Crow's Nest in Words and Pictures")

     Over the years, the support for preserving Crow's Nest has been overwhelming.  The following is a sampling of quotes about Crow's Nest from citizens, scientists, elected officials and others.  The views expressed here, of course, are those of the authors alone.

 "We believe Crow's Nest is a tremendous site and it should be protected."
—Andrew French, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(
Free Lance-Star, September 28, 2001)

 

"Such a rare and beautiful place should and must be protected from development.  We need more open wild spaces like [Crow’s Nest] to protect endangered and rare animal and plants species.  And to maintain and improve our water quality with these valuable wetland areas.  And Crows Nest has such important historical sites as well."
—Donna Finnegan
(letter to DEQ, October 13, 2004)

 

"No one will be homeless if Crow's Nest is not developed. This property is not owned by an individual trying to leave something for his or her children."
—Jane Obert
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, January 29, 2004)

 

"It's a beautiful piece of property that should be preserved."
—Ferris Belman, then-Chair, Stafford County Board of Supervisors
(Free Lance-Star, September 28, 2001)

 

"[Crow’s Nest], if protected, will leave a legacy for the citizens of both Stafford County and the state of Virginia…Hopefully, we, the citizens of this fine county, will be able to pass something on to our future generations.”
—James M. Clark
(letter to DEQ, October 13, 2004)

 

"Stafford County’s Comprehensive Plan states that 45.5% of Stafford’s soils are classified as severely limited for the building homes.   The soils of Crow’s Nest fall into this category.  The Comprehensive Plan also notes that practically the entire peninsula has slopes which are greater than 25%.  Much of the remaining area is Resource Protection Area.  The marshes in both Accokeek and Potomac Creeks are irreplaceable resources.  Without even addressing the natural heritage resources of the peninsula, it is clear to us that permanent protection is essential to guard water quality in our two creeks, the Potomac River, and the Chesapeake Bay."
—Patricia G. Kurpiel, Project Coordinator, Stafford Creeks Water Quality Monitoring Project
(letter to DEQ, October 14, 2004)

 

"Personally I would love to see [Crow’s Nest] saved in its entirety, simply because the whole peninsula has historic and prehistoric sites. Then there's the ecological part. You have some very rare species, and some of the last virgin timber. Do you want to just put some houses on it? Are you going to pave over everything in the county? The county could use it for an environmental teaching area. It also could be used for limited hunting. There are all kinds of things that can be done with the property that doesn't include new houses."
—Barbara Kirby, Stafford County Planning Commission
(Free Lance-Star, May 7, 2004)

 

"If the residents of Stafford fail to protect their birthrights, no one else will. There will always be outside interests wanting to make a quick buck and ready to roll over every pristine piece of land left."
—L.B. Gschwandtner
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, March 5, 2004)

 

"[Crow’s Nest] is a gorgeous piece of land and needs to be preserved and protected from development once and for all."

—Christopher W. Reed
(letter to DEQ, October 13, 2004)

 

"It's the desire of the Stafford Board of Supervisors to preserve [Crow’s Nest] for a natural area and not develop it."
—C.M. Williams, Stafford County Administrator
(Free Lance-Star, July 4, 2002)

 

"[Crow’s Nest] is a treasure and its use as a wildlife preserve plus hiking trails for wildlife, historical, and prehistorical lectures / research will be a great plus for the future generations of the Commonwealth of Virginia.  It will assist in establishing a much needed addition to wildlife habitat in the Stafford County area."  
—Dr. Richard D. Lewis
(letter to DEQ, October 13, 2004)

 

"The preservation of Crow's Nest is possible. Other communities have found ways to preserve important properties. We can, too."
—Anne Little
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, March 8, 2004)

 

"As one of the largest unfragmented deciduous forests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Crow's Nest is very important to neotropical birds migrating along the East Coast."
—Dr. Mamie Parker, acting Northeast Regional Director, US Fish & Wildlife Service
(Press release, September 5, 2000, http://northeast.fws.gov/newsrel/accokeek.html)


"Crows Nest is a unique natural asset…As Stafford County continues to develop, future generations can look back at this point in time and say that their predecessors had the foresight to do the right thing for all time by capturing this opportunity [to save Crow’s Nest]."
—Patrick Coady, founding board member of the Northern Virginia Conservation Trust
(letter to DEQ, October 15, 2004)

 

"We can find a way to save this land, and in doing so, save ourselves."
—Archer Di Peppe
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, January 31, 2004) 

 

"Having had the pleasure to visit the Crow's Nest property several years ago, I saw firsthand how beautiful it is. It would be a travesty for any builder to carve it up, destroying all the natural beauty in order to make their megabucks.  What do they care? They won't be forced to live with the results of their actions."
—Judy Humphrey
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, December 21, 2004)

 

"Biologists from the Division of Natural Heritage in Virginia's Department of Conservation and Recreation and from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service characterize the [Crow’s Nest] peninsula as nearly pristine. The area also has a very rich cultural history with Native American, Colonial, and Civil War importance."
—US Fish & Wildlife Service
(Press release, September 5, 2000, http://northeast.fws.gov/newsrel/accokeek.html)

   

"[Crow’s Nest] is a very important part of Virginia's land mass. Its preservation will place a break in what is otherwise a dismal string of over developed parcels in the corridor between Washington D. C. and Fredericksburg….Preserving large areas of land to break up that dismal continuity is a step towards creating a truly pleasing environment."
—John M. Chinn
(letter to DEQ, October 14, 2004) 

  

"Replacing [Crow’s Nest] with residential or commercial development would, in my view, be a travesty. We are already straining from the effects of over development in Stafford County."
—Kathy Sampeck
(letter to DEQ, October 14, 2004) 

  

"I remember going out [to Crow’s Nest] as a young man. I encourage everyone to see it."
—Gary Snellings, Stafford Board of Supervisors, Hartwood District
(Free Lance-Star, March 6, 2002) 

  

"I share the feeling of the late Congressman Herbert Bateman, Stafford officials and citizens that Crow's Nest should be preserved in its natural state and will do whatever may be necessary to accomplish that goal."
—Jo Ann Davis, U.S. Representative (then candidate)
Press release, September 29, 2000 (http://www.joanndavis.com/news0929.htm) 

  

"That property is too precious, too valuable to lose… I don't want to see any development on Crow's Nest whatsoever."
—Kandy Hilliard, Stafford Board of Supervisors, Aquia District
(Free Lance-Star, February 15, 2004) 
    

"The future quality of Stafford County and the Fredericksburg area depends on holding onto key pieces of land with historic and natural value, like Crow's Nest.  It is the responsibility of the present generation to make sound decisions that will preserve these resources, not only for our present pleasure and use but also for that of future generations. We must be responsible."
—Bob Dodge
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, March 12, 2004)

 

"Your elected officials need to know that you expect them to actually take action to save Crow's Nest, not to just agree that it should be saved. Your politicians are not going to do anything else unless you insist."
—Paul Milde
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, February 15, 2004) 


"Throughout the late 1940s and the 1950s my father took us five siblings to Crow's Nest for our Nature Walks. We learned lessons in that beautiful, pristine environment that stood us in unique stead throughout our formal educations [through graduate degrees]. This cannot be replicated once it is destroyed by development."
—James and Rebecca Guy
(letter to DEQ, October 15, 2004) 

  

"There is so much we can do with [Crow’s Nest] to preserve and enjoy it naturally. But giving up to rich developers so they can make a buck is just plain selling out on something precious. Please, please, preserve this land for future generations to enjoy its richness and beauty, just the way it is."
—Lisa and Jack Sullivan, and family
(letter to DEQ, October 15, 2004) 

  

"Crow's Nest is unique because it is a forest on limestone ravines surrounded by freshwater tidal marshes, which create greater biodiversity. Rare plants and endangered animals inhabit the point. Also the short-nose sturgeon, an endangered species of fish, come to the marshes."
—“Protecting the Environment”
(Free Lance-Star, August 20, 2003)

 

"Too much land that should have been preserved has instead been developed. I'm truly hoping this trend stops here."
—Colleen Quinnell
(letter to DEQ, October 15, 2004) 

  

"Stafford is rapidly changing from rural agricultural and waterfront to suburb and commercial.  Saving a resource like Crow's Nest for preservation and appropriate recreational use will be appreciated by future Stafford residents for hundreds of years and hopefully even longer.  We must take advantage of such opportunities when we can."
—Bob Dodge
(letter to DEQ, October 15, 2004) 

 

"Crow's Nest Peninsula is the finest example of mature forest and wildlife habitat left in this part of Virginia."
—Aimee DeLach, Defenders of Wildlife
(Washington Post, December 28, 2004) 

 

"The battle to save Crow's Nest is not just about preserving a gorgeous piece of land, it is about stopping an out-of-town developer, whose main interest is in making a profit, from destroying one of our community's natural treasures and leaving us with more traffic and related woes than we already have in this rapidly growing community."
—Mary Becelia
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, March 7, 2004) 

  

"As a young man, I enjoyed paddling up Potomac Creek to view the wildlife. On any given trip I would encounter some combination of ducks, geese, black and white swans, herons, muskrats, deer, and even an occasional red fox. If you want to see some of the most incredible fish in Virginia waters, you need only to paddle up into the marsh in the spring to see monstrous shad and thousands of herring…To develop Crow's Nest would be a loss for posterity, and a gain for only a few."
—Gordon Silver
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, March 7, 2004) 

 

"When developers are opposed, those in opposition are accused of being against change. On the contrary: The change will be when the people--not the developers--win one."
—John Chinn
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, April 1, 2004) 

 

"The proposed development of Crow's Nest is an outrage that should be opposed by everyone who is concerned about the region's quality of life… If we let K&M cut down the trees, pave the roads, and displace the wildlife, we will have gained another in a long list of unsightly developments--and we will have lost a unique and irreplaceable regional treasure."
—David Croteau
(letter to the editor, Free Lance-Star, January 21, 2004)

 

"For what it's worth, I have to add my voice to those thousands of others who have visited Crow's Nest and come away saying: 'Crow's Nest must be saved.'"
—columnist Paul Sullivan, after a hike on Crow’s Nest
(Free Lance-Star, February 28, 2004) 

  

Note: Quotes referenced as "letter to DEQ" are from letters citizens wrote to the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), supporting the County's application for a low-interest loan to purchase Crow's Nest.